European Journal of Health and Biology Education

European Journal of Health and Biology Education, 2025 - Volume 12 Issue 1, Article No: e2503

Published Online: 03 Mar 2025

Views: 30 | Downloads: 18

This study examines the impact of practical laboratory work on the academic performance of senior secondary biology learners in the Khomas Region Namibia. Employing a quantitative research approach, data was collected from four purposively selected schools. Data were collected through document analysis of the four schools of with two schools were fully furnished with science laboratory and the other two lacked science laboratory. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze quantitative data. The findings indicate a notable influence of laboratory exposure on academic performance of learners in understanding science concepts, with learners who have access to laboratory facilities demonstrating higher levels of achievement. However, it was also observed that even learners without laboratory access strive to excel by diligently grasping theoretical concepts. Recommendations drawn from this study include advocating for the establishment of laboratories in schools lacking such facilities, as well as encouraging collaboration between schools to facilitate access to laboratory resources. This study underscores the importance of practical work in biology and calls for concerted efforts to ensure equitable access to laboratory resources for all learners.

practical work biology laboratory Namibia academic achievement

• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
• Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. J. (2012). Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 1035-1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21036
• Aloovi, O. A. (2016). Biology teachers’ lived experiences of the Namibian senior secondary certificate (NSSC) curriculum [Master’s thesis, Stellenbosch University]. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/100038
• Asamoah, D. Y., & Aboagye, G. K. (2019). Integration of practical work into teaching and learning of physics at the senior high school level: The Oguaa Educator, 13, 52-69. https://doi.org/10.47963/toe.v13i.295
• Asheela, E., Ngcoza, K. M., & Sewry, J. (2020). The use of easily accessible resources during hands-on practical activities in rural under-resourced Namibian schools. In U Ramnarain (Ed.), School science practical work in Africa (pp. 14-31). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429260650-2
• Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702496
• Bertram, C., & Christiansen, I. (2015). Understanding research: An introduction to reading research. Van Schaik Publishers.
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
• Budert-Waltz, T. (2021). What is research methodology? https://study.com/learn/lesson/research-methodology-examples-approaches-techniques.html
• Chamany, K., Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2008). Making Biology learning relevant to learners: Integrating people, history, and context into college Biology teaching. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(3), 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-06-0029
• Cheung, K. C. (1992). An explication of a path model of classroom teaching: Mediating effects of practical work on physics achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 18(4), 423-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192920180408
• Davie, G., & Wyatt, D. (2021). Document analysis. In S. Engler, & M. Stausberg (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in the study of religion (pp. 245-255). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003222491-18
• Dike, N. (2009). Collaborative involvement in funding biology laboratory equipment and facilities in tertiary institutions in Nigeria: Issues and approaches. Nigerian Journal of Science and Educational Research, 5, 86-93.
• Glover, S. R.-C. (2013). The implementation of a service-learning component in an organic chemistry laboratory course. https://scite.ai/reports/10.1021/ed2008153
• Hambabi, K. T., Tileni, N. L. L., & Moses, C. (2024). Exploring teachers’ perspectives and challenges in implementing the revised biology education curriculum: A case study of the Ompundja circuit. Creative Education, 15(5), 838-855. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2024.155051
• Hamunyela, H. N., Makaye, J., & Cruz, K. C. D. (2022). implementation of the revised biology curriculum in selected junior secondary schools in Namibia. Creative Education, 13(9), 2958-2972. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.139187
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(S1), S28-S54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
• Ibrahim, N. M. (2021). The attitude of Biology teachers towards improvisation and utilization of instructional materials in teaching and learning biology in private secondary schools in Potiskum Local Government Area. https://scite.ai/reports/10.30574/gscarr.2021.8.1.0112
• Kandjeo-Marenga, H. (2023). Teaching and learning implications on group experiments and teacher demonstrations to teaching of process skills in biology: A case of two Namibian secondary schools. Analytical Reports in International Education, 4, 43-66. https://doi.org/10.3890/1542-3882-4-3
• Kasiyo, C., Denuga, D., & Mukwambo, M. (2017). An investigation and intervention on challenges faced by natural science teachers when conducting practical work in the in three selected school of Zambesi Region in Namibia. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology and Sciences, 34, 23-33. http://asrjetsjournal.org/
• Kaupitwa, E. A., & Amuthenu, S. H. (2022). Exploring the status and the utulisation of biology laboratories in a secondary school in Namibia. Open Access Library Journal, 9(9), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108954
• Kelly, K. (2023). What is data analysis? https://www.simlilearn.com/data-analysis-methods-process-types-article
• Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education, 91(6), 1010-1030. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20219
• Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
• Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222), Article 1261757. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261757
• Little, S. (2008). Inquiry-based learning and technology–Supporting institutional TEL within one pedagogical context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 422-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00842.x
• Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. National Academy of Sciences, 308, 1-21.
• MoAEC. (2021). Report on the examination NSSCO. Ministry of Education, Arts, and Culture. http://www.moe.gov.na
• Nghipandulwa, L. (2011). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of the importance of practical work in biology in Oshana Education Region [Master’s thesis, University of Namibia].
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
• NRC. (2006). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. The National Academies Press.
• Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2010). Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Quay, J., & Seaman, J. (2013). John Dewey and education outdoors: Making sense of the educational situation through more than a century of progressive reforms. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-215-0
• Shivolo, T. (2024). Transforming science teaching in Namibia: A practical work inquiry framework for secondary schools. Aquademia, 8(1), Article ep24004. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/14698
• Shivolo, T., & Mokiwa, H.O. (2024). Secondary school teachers’ conceptions of teaching science practical work through inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 10(2), 120-139. https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.693
• Sowell, E. J. (1989). Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(5), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.20.5.0498
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion learners working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
• Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb17229.x
• Tordzro, G., Asamoah, E., & Ofori, K. N. (2021). Biology education in perspective: An inquiry into Ghanaian senior high school learners’ attitude towards Biology practical lessons. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 15(4), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2021/v15i430270
• Woodley, E. (2009). Practical work in school science–Why is it important. School Science Review, 91(335), 49-51.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.